Tuesday, August 23, 2016
Hammer and Sickle '65
Here's an excerpt from chapter 5 of the new novel, King of Soul, now being researched and written. We're talkin' 'bout 1965:
The manipulations of human history had conspired to contrive a vast, geographical hook. The hook itself was forged in the shape of a country; it was a skinny little wire of a nation, slung long and slender along the 900-mile S-curve of an Asian sea strand. Upon this seacoast hook the fearless pride of Pax Americana would be fearlessly snagged, fish-like. But the snagging ended up requiring an extremely long expedition, for the catch fought on the line for eleven years before being reeled in.
This was Ho’s intention all along; he was a very patient angler. Ho was not a novice; he had been around the world a time or two. He’d been to London and to Paris, Hong Kong and Can-ton. He had spent part of the 1930’s in Stalin’s Russia, and had learned a thing or two by observing Uncle Joe’s tactics. Ho Chi Minh understood what it would take to get his fish on the line, and how to handle the catch once it was snagged. The expedition would take 11 years, but eventually South Vietnam was dragged up into the Viet Minh boat.
Uncle Ho had learned a thing or two.
Around the world, especially in defeated France and in bold America, there was talk about Ho Chi Minh—who was he and who did he think he was and what the hell was he capable of.
Some folks never saw the hook at all. When they looked at that odd-shaped southeast Asian country on the map, it resembled something else, with its long arc curving around the western shore of the South China Sea. . . . . maybe a domino?
No. Vietnam was no domino; there was nothing straight nor square about the place. Nothing predictable. But we didn’t know that until much later in the game.
The shape of Vietnam did, however, have resemblance to a sickle, like that sickle of the infamous hammer and sickle. It was a curved blade, hauled upon the lean, hard backs of legions of peasant laborers. As the years of the 1960’s rolled by, the sickle was forged into a weapon, to be skillfully wielded in the hands of militarized Viet Minh insurgents and Viet Cong guerillas. And that army of sickles was backed up by the persistent pounding of Uncle Ho’s communist hammer.
Vietnam was a hammer and sickle; that’s all. It wasn’t some great domino scenario that toppled the Republic of the South during the 1960’s, ultimately rejecting President Diem and killing him, and then later ousting Thieu and Madame Nhu, like Ho had swung up at Dien Bien Phu.
After the French pulled out—with tail between their legs in 1954—when the Americans pulled in, hellbent on showin’ the world how to defeat communist incursion, it was pretty slow going for awhile. B’rer Ho Chi Fox, he lay low, waitin’ to see what B’rer Rabbit-ears would pickup on his radio, because B’rer Rabbit did have a pretty fancy radio, and a lot of heavy equipment to back it up with, and a heap o’ ordnance to fling around with a lot of fired-up thunderations. B’rer Rabbit-ears could sho'nuff make some powerful destructions when he put his mind to it.
By the time things got really cranked up in 1965, the man in charge of yankee warfare had come up with a plan. But there was a problem.
The problem was an old one; stated simply, from a mathematical viewpoint, it was this: the shortest distance between two points is a straight line.
No way around it; shortest distance between Hanoi and Saigon was a straight line. But the line didn’t go through Vietnam; it went right through two other countries.
If Uncle Ho were to set a taut insurgent line of troop transport from, say, Hanoi to Saigon—like from the handle of the sickle to the endpoint of the sickle’s curved blade—it would pass, not through the south part of Vietnam, but through Laos and Cambodia.
This was a problem. It wasn’t so much a problem for Ho—his stealthy, low-lyin’ insurgent diehards just crawled right under the rules of international proprietary expectations; they slouched through Laotian jungles and beneath Cambodian canopies like it was nobody’s business. After a while, the clandestine route they had cut for themselves was called by the name of the one who had commissioned it: the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
King of Soul
Saturday, August 13, 2016
It's the Contest
The destroyer is a spirit, a corrupted zeitgeist.
But in spite of his apparent worldwide heist,
he is no christ.
He's eloquent in spreading fear
while whispering in your ear.
She slides in on a sled of doubt
chewing up our courage, then spitting it out.
He serves up fodder for defeat;
she slices delectable discouragement for meat.
The destroyer fastens our attention
on cultivating nervous tension.
He's obsessive with dismay;
she casts hope and care away.
They display
excrutiatingly excellent excuses
to focus on all those world-driven abuses
for which we have no productive uses
so that accomplishments can be decimated,
achievements aggravated
and defeat elevated
to a sordid art form
so as to blot out our war-torn
mission
as if by atomic fission.
Hey, they say,
it's all going to blow someday,
maybe the big one even comes today.
The destroyer will habitually say
conspiracy is the order of the day,
and rational order has been put down
as we're all just fooling' around.
She says decency went out with the tide,
been cast aside,
and integrity is dead
and that we should just party down instead
because the whole damn system is fixed
for sure, bewitched
and our course cannot be switched
cuz life's a bitch,
not a beach.
So don't bother to reach
out.
Just glory in the art of pout.
We'll make of complaint an art form
and criticism a craft, to adorn
our death-wish thanatos
with exquisite, tragic loss.
On the other hand
as far as the east is from the west,
in spite of all that, we could be supremely blessed.
The comforter says you can do this;
your arrow is not destined to always miss.
If the system is rigged what does it matter;
your hopes and dreams aren't doomed to splatter
on the mean streets of this world
because the true kingdom is not of this world;
it displays a flag unfurled,
that flutters in our heart
urging us to start
a work, an art
apart
to begin anew
a place for me and you
a place in the son
no matter what the gun
has done
to make us turn and run
from the challenges of this screwed-up life.
We can overcome and defeat this strife
by faith, by hope, by true love,
bestowed to us from above
if we can allow the destroyer in us to be crucified.
On a cross of sacrifice, that enemy has died,
and to its own defeat is tied.
But I'm not tied to it;
they can't make you do it.
Death doesn't have to overcome me, nor defeat you;
I tell you true.
We shall rise above it all
if you can hear the call
of resurrected victory
for you and me:
He's signaling from the other side
if you can resist the tide
of death-wish thanatos
and the destroyer's proposed eternal loss.
You may hear otherwise,
but death itself in the end just dies.
Selah.
Traveler's Rest
Labels:
comfort,
conspiracy,
death,
despair,
destruction,
discouragement,
dismay,
doubt,
east and west,
Hope,
life,
life and death,
poem,
poetry,
resurrection,
zeitgeist
Thursday, August 11, 2016
Mysteries of 1964: Meridian and Tonkin
From the new novel King of Soul, now being researched and written, here's an excerpt. In chapter 4, we find Uncle Cannon speaking about murder in Mississippi, and then the scene changes. As Uncle Cannon was saying, on August 4, 1964 . . .
“Now these white-power types and KKK misfits who been runnin' around for a hundred years like they own the place—now they won’t have a leg to stand on when Bobby Kennedy and Hoover’s FBI agents show up with their high-falootin’ writs of law. I’m sure the Feds knew if they’d root around long enough, something rotten would turn up.”
“Well now something has turned up. Three dead bodies. Over near Meridian, they found those three dead boys—two yankee college students and one local black, and all hell is gonna break loose. The old ways are gonna go, but they ain't gonna die without a fight—probably a pretty damned ugly one.”
The old man shook his head. “With Kennedy being shot last year in Dallas, and now Johnson, who is an extremely competent politician, following in his wake, this whole civil rights movement will mount up like a tidal wave. It’s gonna break right over the Mason-Dixon line and keep on going, until it rolls all the way down to the Gulf. . .”
~~~
It just so happened that, while Uncle Cannon’s projections were being uttered into the sultry southern air, a wave of a different kind was being set in motion on the other side of the world. It went thrashing just beneath the choppy surface of Gulf waters that lie between the coasts of China and Vietnam. The Gulf of Ton-kin.
A phosphorescent wake—the eerie, night-time straight-line underwater path of a launched torpedo—went suddenly slashing beneath the stormy surface of the Gulf of Ton-kin, sixty miles off the coast of Vietnam. The torpedo had a target: a destroyer ship of the U.S. Navy.
Under cover of the dark, stormy night, the torpedo’s path was nigh-impossible to see, almost as difficult to detect as the P-4 North Vietnamese patrol boat from which it had been launched.
In the air above the USS Turner Joy naval destroyer, a plane-launched flare erupted, illuminating for a few moments the rain-stilted night sky. In the desperate brilliance of one flare flash, a boatsman’s mate caught plain sight of the attacking boat; he noticed, in the fleeting brightness, an odd detail—its long bow.
Meanwhile, all hell was breaking loose, with the two U.S. Navy destroyers firing ordnance wildly into the stalking mysteries of the Tonkin Gulf. Two members of the gun crew sighted the offending boat in the strange light of their own exploding 3-inch shells; one squinting seaman managed to hold the object in view for what seemed like almost two minutes.
Two signalmen, peering through dark Tonkin night-soup, strove to pinpoint the patrol boat’s searchlight, as it swept through the dark seas several thousand yards off the starboard bow; Director 31 operator could identify a mast, with a small cross piece, off the destroyer’s port quarter, as it was illuminated in the glare of an exploding shell that the Turner Joy had fired.
Ahead of the USS Turner Joy, on the flagship Maddox, two Marine machine-gunners were posted on the ship’s signal bridge; after sighting what appeared to be the cockpit light of a small-craft, they watched through the fierce weather. Having no orders to fire, they visually tracked the unidentified vessel—friend or foe they didn’t know—as it churned up along port side of their ship; later the miniscule light was seen coming back down on starboard.
Up on the flagship Maddox bridge, Operations Officer Commander Buehler was not surprised at the spotty hodgepodge of indecipherable bogey signals and sightings from various quarters of the two ships; for his ship’s radar contact had earlier indicated something approaching at high speed, which had suddenly turned left when it was 6000 yards from and abeam of the USS Maddox. He knew from the swerve that whatever that was—some vessel the radar contact had indicated—had fired an underwater torpedo. Approximately three minute later, a topside crewman on the Turner Joy had spotted the thin, phosphorescent wake of the torpedo as it missed both ships and then disappeared in the dark Tonkin waters that chopped beneath them.
Later, black smoke could be discerned, rising in a column through the black night, and the mysterious P-4 bogey aggressors were seen no more. Where did they go? Davy Jones locker.
King of Soul
“Now these white-power types and KKK misfits who been runnin' around for a hundred years like they own the place—now they won’t have a leg to stand on when Bobby Kennedy and Hoover’s FBI agents show up with their high-falootin’ writs of law. I’m sure the Feds knew if they’d root around long enough, something rotten would turn up.”
“Well now something has turned up. Three dead bodies. Over near Meridian, they found those three dead boys—two yankee college students and one local black, and all hell is gonna break loose. The old ways are gonna go, but they ain't gonna die without a fight—probably a pretty damned ugly one.”
The old man shook his head. “With Kennedy being shot last year in Dallas, and now Johnson, who is an extremely competent politician, following in his wake, this whole civil rights movement will mount up like a tidal wave. It’s gonna break right over the Mason-Dixon line and keep on going, until it rolls all the way down to the Gulf. . .”
~~~
It just so happened that, while Uncle Cannon’s projections were being uttered into the sultry southern air, a wave of a different kind was being set in motion on the other side of the world. It went thrashing just beneath the choppy surface of Gulf waters that lie between the coasts of China and Vietnam. The Gulf of Ton-kin.
A phosphorescent wake—the eerie, night-time straight-line underwater path of a launched torpedo—went suddenly slashing beneath the stormy surface of the Gulf of Ton-kin, sixty miles off the coast of Vietnam. The torpedo had a target: a destroyer ship of the U.S. Navy.
Under cover of the dark, stormy night, the torpedo’s path was nigh-impossible to see, almost as difficult to detect as the P-4 North Vietnamese patrol boat from which it had been launched.
In the air above the USS Turner Joy naval destroyer, a plane-launched flare erupted, illuminating for a few moments the rain-stilted night sky. In the desperate brilliance of one flare flash, a boatsman’s mate caught plain sight of the attacking boat; he noticed, in the fleeting brightness, an odd detail—its long bow.
Meanwhile, all hell was breaking loose, with the two U.S. Navy destroyers firing ordnance wildly into the stalking mysteries of the Tonkin Gulf. Two members of the gun crew sighted the offending boat in the strange light of their own exploding 3-inch shells; one squinting seaman managed to hold the object in view for what seemed like almost two minutes.
Two signalmen, peering through dark Tonkin night-soup, strove to pinpoint the patrol boat’s searchlight, as it swept through the dark seas several thousand yards off the starboard bow; Director 31 operator could identify a mast, with a small cross piece, off the destroyer’s port quarter, as it was illuminated in the glare of an exploding shell that the Turner Joy had fired.
Ahead of the USS Turner Joy, on the flagship Maddox, two Marine machine-gunners were posted on the ship’s signal bridge; after sighting what appeared to be the cockpit light of a small-craft, they watched through the fierce weather. Having no orders to fire, they visually tracked the unidentified vessel—friend or foe they didn’t know—as it churned up along port side of their ship; later the miniscule light was seen coming back down on starboard.
Up on the flagship Maddox bridge, Operations Officer Commander Buehler was not surprised at the spotty hodgepodge of indecipherable bogey signals and sightings from various quarters of the two ships; for his ship’s radar contact had earlier indicated something approaching at high speed, which had suddenly turned left when it was 6000 yards from and abeam of the USS Maddox. He knew from the swerve that whatever that was—some vessel the radar contact had indicated—had fired an underwater torpedo. Approximately three minute later, a topside crewman on the Turner Joy had spotted the thin, phosphorescent wake of the torpedo as it missed both ships and then disappeared in the dark Tonkin waters that chopped beneath them.
Later, black smoke could be discerned, rising in a column through the black night, and the mysterious P-4 bogey aggressors were seen no more. Where did they go? Davy Jones locker.
King of Soul
Monday, August 1, 2016
A New Bretton Woods?
We were in Rome about a year and a half ago, as part of a traveling celebration of our 35th wedding anniversary.
One evening as we were lollygagging through the busy rain-slicked streets and sidewalks, we passed in front of a very special building. It was the Rome headquarters of the European Union, or "EU".
I wanted to take a picture of the building's entry, because that is what tourists do--take pictures of important places. Seeking a broader view, I crossed the street. While positioning myself and the phone to snap a pic, the guard across the street noticed my activity. He started waving at me frantically, indicating that what I was doing was not permitted.
Excuse me. I was taking a picture of a public building.
In America, we take pictures of .gov buildings, because we have, you know, a government of the people, by the people and for the people, which means, among other things that the people can take pictures of their headquarterses (as Golem might say.)
Is this not the way you do it in Europe? No pictures of the RomeEU headquarters?
Nevertheless, here is my smuggled pic:
If you squint at my little jpeg here, you may discern the guard's upraised right alarm, a gesture of command intended to communicate a stop order on my touristic activity. It vaguely resembles another raised-arm signal that was in use in Europe 75 years ago, during the regime of Mussolini and that German guy who considered the Italian dictator to be his own puppet.
Or maybe I'm being too cynical about this incident. Maybe the guard was saluting me in some way, acknowledging my importance as an American tourist in the city of Rome.
Now, a year and a half later, this morning, seated comfortably in my own humble domicile, back in the USSA . . . I was pondering the idea of government--whether it is truly "of. . .by the people", or is it something else? Is it, as many citizens insist during these times of tumultuous societal change, actually an institution through which the "1%" (or as they said back in the old days, the "rich and powerful") project their oligarchical manipulations upon the rest of us?
I was thinking about this after reading online an article about how the worldwide financial system that has evolved.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/3993559-back-square-one-financial-system-needs-reset?ifp=0
In this Seeking Alpha blogpost, Valentin Schmid, as "Epoch Times" examines our international monetary system. His analysis appears to be generated from a well-informed position in the world of money, assets and power.
Mr. Schmid raises the question of whether the current (worldwide) debt load can ever be repaid, because there isn't enough "real money" to go around.
This got my attention, because I have been thinking for a while that there isn't enough "real money" to go around.
Haha, as if I knew about such things. I don't know much about money; if I did, I would have more of it.
Anyway, Mr. Schmid's question is answered by his guest interviewee, Paul Brodsky, in this way:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_Conference
So what is coming is, perhaps, this:
To compensate for a stalling of global productivity, the movers/shakers of the world may construct a new, top-down rearrangement of the world financial system. The purpose of this revision will be to fix the problem of not enough money to go around. Such an extensive reconstruction as this would be has not been done since the Bretton Woods agreement that was promulgated by delegates from 44 Allied nations in 1944.
In a 21st-century world inhabited by billions of inhabitants, our accessibility to natural resources has heretofore been determined by how many holes we could drill in the ground to extract natural resources; and how many acres of crops we could plant to produce food; how many factories we could build, and so on. . . building an economy to work toward spreading the bounty around.
In the future, however, we will be moving to a "knowledge" economy. Wealth creation will not be about how much you can dig in a day's time, nor how much you can plant, nor what you can cobble together in your back yard or over on Main Street.
Wealth generation in the future will be determined by what you know, so start learning now.
The first three essential things to know are these:
Reading, Writing, Arithmetic.
Well gollee, maybe it won't be such a brave new world after all.
However this thing plays out, if enough of us can master these three skills, .gov of the people, by the people and for the people will not perish from the earth, we hope.
Glass half-Full
One evening as we were lollygagging through the busy rain-slicked streets and sidewalks, we passed in front of a very special building. It was the Rome headquarters of the European Union, or "EU".
I wanted to take a picture of the building's entry, because that is what tourists do--take pictures of important places. Seeking a broader view, I crossed the street. While positioning myself and the phone to snap a pic, the guard across the street noticed my activity. He started waving at me frantically, indicating that what I was doing was not permitted.
Excuse me. I was taking a picture of a public building.
In America, we take pictures of .gov buildings, because we have, you know, a government of the people, by the people and for the people, which means, among other things that the people can take pictures of their headquarterses (as Golem might say.)
Is this not the way you do it in Europe? No pictures of the RomeEU headquarters?
Nevertheless, here is my smuggled pic:
If you squint at my little jpeg here, you may discern the guard's upraised right alarm, a gesture of command intended to communicate a stop order on my touristic activity. It vaguely resembles another raised-arm signal that was in use in Europe 75 years ago, during the regime of Mussolini and that German guy who considered the Italian dictator to be his own puppet.
Or maybe I'm being too cynical about this incident. Maybe the guard was saluting me in some way, acknowledging my importance as an American tourist in the city of Rome.
Now, a year and a half later, this morning, seated comfortably in my own humble domicile, back in the USSA . . . I was pondering the idea of government--whether it is truly "of. . .by the people", or is it something else? Is it, as many citizens insist during these times of tumultuous societal change, actually an institution through which the "1%" (or as they said back in the old days, the "rich and powerful") project their oligarchical manipulations upon the rest of us?
I was thinking about this after reading online an article about how the worldwide financial system that has evolved.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/3993559-back-square-one-financial-system-needs-reset?ifp=0
In this Seeking Alpha blogpost, Valentin Schmid, as "Epoch Times" examines our international monetary system. His analysis appears to be generated from a well-informed position in the world of money, assets and power.
Mr. Schmid raises the question of whether the current (worldwide) debt load can ever be repaid, because there isn't enough "real money" to go around.
This got my attention, because I have been thinking for a while that there isn't enough "real money" to go around.
Haha, as if I knew about such things. I don't know much about money; if I did, I would have more of it.
Anyway, Mr. Schmid's question is answered by his guest interviewee, Paul Brodsky, in this way:
. . . "I would argue central banks lost the ability to control the credit cycle. Some relatively minor event could trigger a series of events that creates the need for a sit-down among global monetary policy makers who finally have to acknowledge publicly that their policies are no longer able to control the system, the global economy, which is based on ever increasing demand through ever increasing credit.
And what might occur is a natural drop in output. So you'll see GDP growth begin to fall. Real GDP growth across the world maybe even be going into contraction and that would spell doom for these balance sheets. And this is not something I'm predicting or trying to time at all, but the natural outcome of that would be a sit-down like a Bretton Woods where arrangements are reconsidered."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_Conference
So what is coming is, perhaps, this:
To compensate for a stalling of global productivity, the movers/shakers of the world may construct a new, top-down rearrangement of the world financial system. The purpose of this revision will be to fix the problem of not enough money to go around. Such an extensive reconstruction as this would be has not been done since the Bretton Woods agreement that was promulgated by delegates from 44 Allied nations in 1944.
In a 21st-century world inhabited by billions of inhabitants, our accessibility to natural resources has heretofore been determined by how many holes we could drill in the ground to extract natural resources; and how many acres of crops we could plant to produce food; how many factories we could build, and so on. . . building an economy to work toward spreading the bounty around.
In the future, however, we will be moving to a "knowledge" economy. Wealth creation will not be about how much you can dig in a day's time, nor how much you can plant, nor what you can cobble together in your back yard or over on Main Street.
Wealth generation in the future will be determined by what you know, so start learning now.
The first three essential things to know are these:
Reading, Writing, Arithmetic.
Well gollee, maybe it won't be such a brave new world after all.
However this thing plays out, if enough of us can master these three skills, .gov of the people, by the people and for the people will not perish from the earth, we hope.
Glass half-Full
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)