Saturday, June 30, 2012
Health care
One thing we surely know about health care is: everybody needs some sooner or later. We are working on this.
Friday, June 29, 2012
Allegorical vs. Real Characters in Fiction
Now I'm writing a third novel, Smoke.
My son said my fictional characters are formed too heavily upon allegorical concepts instead of real people. I think his assessment is correct. What am I going to do about it? That is the question.
As if that wasn't enough, my dentist was drilling away on my novel bridgework as well. A few weeks ago, he remarked that the first novel had "a lot of characters." That's true. I'm all over the place with these imaginary people, which renders my novel narratives, it seems, too complicated, or scattered, opaque, and therefore not easily accessible to mainstream readers. All true, as I am discovering. I probably knew it all along, to tell the truth, just too stubborn to do anything about it.
But hey, what about the wild-penned luminaries of the past who were venerated, yeah I say unto thee, even catapulted to bookish success, for their obscure story-telling style? I'm talking about Faulkner, Joyce, and. . . well you know the type. Novelists who would cloak all their rambling opi-opuses in arcane symbolism, subtle literary allusions, and stream of consciousness genius run-on sentences which, when read aloud by contemporary poets, always end each phrase with a rising voice intonation as if the speaker had just declared or questioned the most profound literary utterances ever laid out bare and naked for all the world to read and all the New York editors to puzzle over to their hearts' content.
Not to mention their protagonists, who are really dysfunctional savants whose character developments reflect societal manifestations of every misfit's compulsion to prove to the world that the deepest desire of modern men and women is simply to go crazy, flinging off the envelopes and tethers of slavish conformity/morality, and then post the video on Utube.
Speaking of which, video images are taking over the world of communication. Text is dead, unless you want to be one of the elite who actually think. I suppose this very rant is evidence of our literary degeneracy. I'm a drowning man here.
But I digress. Need to get back to the heart of the matter. I need to make my fictional characters more like real people, less like allegorical constructs. I'm working on it.
And good story-telling--I need to work on that too, which is why I just read Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure Island--a great story by a master storyteller. Its a book that steadily intensifies suspense from beginning to end while cultivating reader involvement all along the voyage.
I have learned something valuable from Mr. Stevenson. Maybe now the Europe-crushing clash of 1930ish big ideas (as my son calls them) that I've taken on in the new novel, Smoke, can artfully fade into back story support; then Philip, Nathan, and Tabitha will navigate, in a very believable tale, the perils of a world hung upon the edge of communo-fascist disaster in 1937.
We'll see if I can sail this ship back into the trade winds of reader accessibility. Have a nice day.
My son said my fictional characters are formed too heavily upon allegorical concepts instead of real people. I think his assessment is correct. What am I going to do about it? That is the question.
As if that wasn't enough, my dentist was drilling away on my novel bridgework as well. A few weeks ago, he remarked that the first novel had "a lot of characters." That's true. I'm all over the place with these imaginary people, which renders my novel narratives, it seems, too complicated, or scattered, opaque, and therefore not easily accessible to mainstream readers. All true, as I am discovering. I probably knew it all along, to tell the truth, just too stubborn to do anything about it.
But hey, what about the wild-penned luminaries of the past who were venerated, yeah I say unto thee, even catapulted to bookish success, for their obscure story-telling style? I'm talking about Faulkner, Joyce, and. . . well you know the type. Novelists who would cloak all their rambling opi-opuses in arcane symbolism, subtle literary allusions, and stream of consciousness genius run-on sentences which, when read aloud by contemporary poets, always end each phrase with a rising voice intonation as if the speaker had just declared or questioned the most profound literary utterances ever laid out bare and naked for all the world to read and all the New York editors to puzzle over to their hearts' content.
Not to mention their protagonists, who are really dysfunctional savants whose character developments reflect societal manifestations of every misfit's compulsion to prove to the world that the deepest desire of modern men and women is simply to go crazy, flinging off the envelopes and tethers of slavish conformity/morality, and then post the video on Utube.
Speaking of which, video images are taking over the world of communication. Text is dead, unless you want to be one of the elite who actually think. I suppose this very rant is evidence of our literary degeneracy. I'm a drowning man here.
But I digress. Need to get back to the heart of the matter. I need to make my fictional characters more like real people, less like allegorical constructs. I'm working on it.
And good story-telling--I need to work on that too, which is why I just read Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure Island--a great story by a master storyteller. Its a book that steadily intensifies suspense from beginning to end while cultivating reader involvement all along the voyage.
I have learned something valuable from Mr. Stevenson. Maybe now the Europe-crushing clash of 1930ish big ideas (as my son calls them) that I've taken on in the new novel, Smoke, can artfully fade into back story support; then Philip, Nathan, and Tabitha will navigate, in a very believable tale, the perils of a world hung upon the edge of communo-fascist disaster in 1937.
We'll see if I can sail this ship back into the trade winds of reader accessibility. Have a nice day.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Sun Yat-sen's memory in Hawaii
Sun Yat-sen was a great leader who managed to lead, 101 years ago, the Chinese people out of their dynastic bondage to the Qing empire.
After many previously failed revolutionary attempts, Mr. Sun was able, by 1911, to summon enough organization and gumption among his countrymen to actually accomplish the liberation for which he had spent most of his life preparing.
How he did that amazing work, I don't know. As nearly as I can surmise from a little bit of incidental reading and a movie or two, his role in Chinese history is similar to George Washington's in our American story. But he was not a military man, as Washington had been. Sun was a thinker, a planner, but he was intelligent and perceptive enough to actually put his revolutionary thoughts and plans into effective action. As a result, he is the founder of the Republic of China. So, since he was not a military leader, I perceive that his role in China's liberation from feudalism is more akin to Thomas Jefferson's.
During his education here in Hawaii (where I am now writing), he became familiar with the writings of Jefferson and other proponents of freedom among the opinions of mankind.
Sun Yat-sen was not, however, a politician; his piloting of the fledgling republic was, I think, removed from his grasp during the 1920s and '30s, and supplanted by the chaotic joustings of military warlords. By the time he died in 1925, the nation was in disarray, and hobbled as a collection of feuding factions. When the Japanese invaded in 1937, the two main groups--Communists and Nationalists--had to make an uneasy truce to drive Hirohito's army out. After the war, Mao's People's Liberation Army were finally able to wrest power, by 1948, from Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang army, which Sun Yat-sen's comrades had formed during the 1911 revolution.
Thus did Mao Tse-dung, Deng Xiaoping, and other Communist leaders enforce, at long last, the People's Republic of China.
Not the same as the Republic of China (1911-1948). Nevertheless, it's all a progression of Chinese politics and military victories. From an optimistic American perspective, one might say that Deng Xiaoping had initiated another revolution, a relatively bloodless one (until June 4, 1989.)
As an American, I don't know much Sun Yat-sen, the father of the Republic of China, but I am happy to report that a very important part of his ideological development was accomplished during his youthful residence and education in Hawaii. Yat-sen's brother, Sun Mei had moved to Hawaii in 1879, prospered greatly, and was one of the richest men in Hawaii by the turn of the century. During those years, Mei saw to it that his younger brother was brought to the Islands to live in freedom and to be educated.
Sun Mei's wealth included 3900 acres of agricultural land on the slopes of Haleakala volcano (now dormant), on the island of Maui.
Two days ago, Pat and I drove through Sun Mei's formerly vast land-holdings, in the district of Maui called Kula. There, very near the old Sun Mei homeplace, we found this memorial, built to commemorate Sun Yat-sen, father of the Chinese Republic, who had spent many an hour, many a month over many years, there in reflection, respite, recreation and rest, before later going back to the Middle Kingdom and making world history.
I will end this brief historical observation with a fact that is, to me, and also (I hope) to the world, quite significant:
Sun Yat-sen was baptized a Christian in Hong Kong in 1887.
CR, with new novel, Smoke, in progress
After many previously failed revolutionary attempts, Mr. Sun was able, by 1911, to summon enough organization and gumption among his countrymen to actually accomplish the liberation for which he had spent most of his life preparing.
How he did that amazing work, I don't know. As nearly as I can surmise from a little bit of incidental reading and a movie or two, his role in Chinese history is similar to George Washington's in our American story. But he was not a military man, as Washington had been. Sun was a thinker, a planner, but he was intelligent and perceptive enough to actually put his revolutionary thoughts and plans into effective action. As a result, he is the founder of the Republic of China. So, since he was not a military leader, I perceive that his role in China's liberation from feudalism is more akin to Thomas Jefferson's.
During his education here in Hawaii (where I am now writing), he became familiar with the writings of Jefferson and other proponents of freedom among the opinions of mankind.
Sun Yat-sen was not, however, a politician; his piloting of the fledgling republic was, I think, removed from his grasp during the 1920s and '30s, and supplanted by the chaotic joustings of military warlords. By the time he died in 1925, the nation was in disarray, and hobbled as a collection of feuding factions. When the Japanese invaded in 1937, the two main groups--Communists and Nationalists--had to make an uneasy truce to drive Hirohito's army out. After the war, Mao's People's Liberation Army were finally able to wrest power, by 1948, from Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang army, which Sun Yat-sen's comrades had formed during the 1911 revolution.
Thus did Mao Tse-dung, Deng Xiaoping, and other Communist leaders enforce, at long last, the People's Republic of China.
Not the same as the Republic of China (1911-1948). Nevertheless, it's all a progression of Chinese politics and military victories. From an optimistic American perspective, one might say that Deng Xiaoping had initiated another revolution, a relatively bloodless one (until June 4, 1989.)
As an American, I don't know much Sun Yat-sen, the father of the Republic of China, but I am happy to report that a very important part of his ideological development was accomplished during his youthful residence and education in Hawaii. Yat-sen's brother, Sun Mei had moved to Hawaii in 1879, prospered greatly, and was one of the richest men in Hawaii by the turn of the century. During those years, Mei saw to it that his younger brother was brought to the Islands to live in freedom and to be educated.
Sun Mei's wealth included 3900 acres of agricultural land on the slopes of Haleakala volcano (now dormant), on the island of Maui.
Two days ago, Pat and I drove through Sun Mei's formerly vast land-holdings, in the district of Maui called Kula. There, very near the old Sun Mei homeplace, we found this memorial, built to commemorate Sun Yat-sen, father of the Chinese Republic, who had spent many an hour, many a month over many years, there in reflection, respite, recreation and rest, before later going back to the Middle Kingdom and making world history.
I will end this brief historical observation with a fact that is, to me, and also (I hope) to the world, quite significant:
Sun Yat-sen was baptized a Christian in Hong Kong in 1887.
CR, with new novel, Smoke, in progress
Labels:
1911 Revolution,
China,
Hawaii,
Maui,
Republic of China,
Sun Mei,
Sun Yat-sen
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Lover Beach
The Ocean is tidy this morning.
the tide is half; the sun comes up
over the swells; Lanai and Molokai loom
across the choppy blue. Old Maui volcano sleeps,
cloudy and vast, heart of the island.
Come to the veranda; bright is the sky!
Always, from the breaking waves
where Pacific pelts this sun-kiss'd isle,
Listen! you hear the roaring power
of our planet that flings up watery wings
and pulls them down again on shifting sand.
Roar, and whisper, and roar again
with cyclical slumber to lose and win
a perpetual thrust of planetary din.
Poet Arnold felt it long ago
among the pebbles of Dover beach, summoning
the futile strands of faithlessness
and existential woe; I
find instead the inevitability of faith
called up to bloom upon this far-flung ocean isle.
The ocean of despair
so near and far in present past, to pound us down on human shores,
throws its tantrum of pointless angst, with cynic sand.
But now I only feel the wave of our resolve
upon a flagg'ed pole of hope,
advancing, in the sun-stirred air
of dawning day, o'er the bright edges of our vision,
as lilies of the field.
Ah, love, let us be true
to one another! for the world, which seems
to pound upon us like a surf of strife,
so relentless, so provocative, so hard,
has a terrible power all its own
that would dash our love and hope in forceful blight.
But we here on our sun-bathed isle,
caressed with waves of love and delight--
we subdue the heartless poundings of the night.
Glass half-Full
the tide is half; the sun comes up
over the swells; Lanai and Molokai loom
across the choppy blue. Old Maui volcano sleeps,
cloudy and vast, heart of the island.
Come to the veranda; bright is the sky!
Always, from the breaking waves
where Pacific pelts this sun-kiss'd isle,
Listen! you hear the roaring power
of our planet that flings up watery wings
and pulls them down again on shifting sand.
Roar, and whisper, and roar again
with cyclical slumber to lose and win
a perpetual thrust of planetary din.
Poet Arnold felt it long ago
among the pebbles of Dover beach, summoning
the futile strands of faithlessness
and existential woe; I
find instead the inevitability of faith
called up to bloom upon this far-flung ocean isle.
The ocean of despair
so near and far in present past, to pound us down on human shores,
throws its tantrum of pointless angst, with cynic sand.
But now I only feel the wave of our resolve
upon a flagg'ed pole of hope,
advancing, in the sun-stirred air
of dawning day, o'er the bright edges of our vision,
as lilies of the field.
Ah, love, let us be true
to one another! for the world, which seems
to pound upon us like a surf of strife,
so relentless, so provocative, so hard,
has a terrible power all its own
that would dash our love and hope in forceful blight.
But we here on our sun-bathed isle,
caressed with waves of love and delight--
we subdue the heartless poundings of the night.
Glass half-Full
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Monday, June 25, 2012
Speculating on a Stratified Story

Wandering on a rocky Hawaiian shore we discovered this layer of red rock stratified between two layers of black rock. I was wondering, how did this happen?
I am no geologist, but I have done a little reading about the earth and the rocks within it, and some exploration, as you can see here. That's my hand in the pic.
In offering a layman's analysis of this geological puzzle, I must begin with a basic fact: The Hawaiian islands are all exposed parts of one very big volcano, situated on the Pacific Ocean floor three miles below the surface, but extending high enough to protrude into air.
In this particular case, the red strata, formerly hidden within massive black/gray lava fields on the edge of Maui island, has been exposed by the erosive action of nearby ocean waves that have been perpetually crashing upon these rocks for a long time.
What I do now about the black layers is that they are igneous rocks formed by volcanic lava, which had flowed from the erupting earth fissures many years ago.
I'm not so sure about the red streak. My investigating touch (shown above in the pic), indicated that the texture of the red rock is granular, sandy, which is different from the feel of the black layers below and above it. This apparently sandy composition may indicate that the red layer is sedimentary rock. If that is correct, we could say that the red, iron-bearing deposit was laid by weathering wind/water forces, and laid upon the black basalt lava rock below it.
Presuming that my sedimentary assessment contains, perhaps, a grain of truth, we could infer that the red streak may indicate a more recent epoch of time when the volcanic lava flow had ceased, enabling earth processes to leave something different for awhile--say, a few thousand years? I don't know.
A geologist could tell you. On the other hand, he may blow my whole theory to smithereens, just like the volcano, Puukukui, blew all that black rock into the location you see here.
Whatever that red layer is, obviously it was later covered by a another black volcanic lava flow, and thus was covered for many an eon until the Pacific Ocean knocked the shoreline around and taught it, and us human inquisitors, a thing or two. If you can help me interpret this stratified story, please do. Rock on.
Glass half-Full
Labels:
geography,
geology,
Hawaiian Islands,
igneous rock,
lava,
layers,
Maui,
Puukukui,
sedimentary rock,
strata,
volcanoes
Sunday, June 24, 2012
This here's for the Rule of Law!
Whether or not they actually could, the people of the British empire sought to civilize the world. One could say, perhaps, that on a good day those loyal subjects of the realm were sauntering forth to bring to unruly distant lands the rule of law, the benefits of a well-constructed language, and good manners, not to mention cricket.
Or one could say that, on a bad day, those John Bull limeys were exploiting the indigenous peoples, robbing them of their ancient heritages, playing contractual tricks to abscond their homelands, and getting rich in the process.
And one would be correct on both counts. Such is the dual nature of civilized man: he is a scoundrel, even as he strives, or pretends to, follow his so-called better angels.
Ditto for us Americans, their bratty little brothers in this saga of colonializing world history. But hey, it is what it is, and that's all that it is, so be that as it may, today or someday.
Nevertheless, one beneficial concept that the world has, IMHO, derived from the hegemonizing Brits, is the rule of law. Like the Romans before them, far-flung British representatives of the Crown have, in recent centuries, carried to the four corners of their known world the idea that justice should prevail, and men should be accountable, in a duly-appointed court of law, for their actions.
Therefore anarchy and mayhem are not permitted.
In British literature, a residual benefit of this principle is demonstrated by Robert Louis Stevenson in his classic story, Treasure Island. I'll not tell thee the tale, as thou must read it for thyself, or find a video of it somewhere online haha, as if there were such a thing.
Nevertheless, I'll take thee in thy imagination, as author Stevenson did, down to a little island in some distant sea wherein lies a hidden treasure that was left behind during a dispute between some gentlemen of fortune, some of them honest, some of them not, but which is which, I'll tell thee what--on second thought--suffice it say, some men were killed, and some got caught.
Years later, as the story is told, having obtained a map that could lead to the buried booty, a band of reputable fortune-seeking men have returned to the island to uncover the misplaced gold, which is a considerable weight of what's called pieces of eight. And if'n you don't know what that is, matey, go look it up on your wikipedia slate.
By and by, I'm a-comin' to my point, lads n' lassies, about the civilizing effects of the British empire. And this is how it happened:
There was, to state it plainly, a mutiny among the men. I don't know how else to say it except that certain dirty/rotten scoundrels were led by their wolf-in-sheep's clothing leader, Long John Silver, into the perfidy of lawless rebellion against the good Captain and the owners of the ship who were with him. And there was among the loyals the good lad, Jim Hawkins, cabin boy, who lived to tell the tale, whose account enables me to write it to thee.
Pirates is what they were, pure and simple--Long John Silver and his mutineers.
During the course of the dispute, an actual battle broke out between the two sides. The Captain and his loyal men had managed to occupy an old stockade. The contemptible buccaneers were planning to overpower them with muskets and swords and the ship's cannon offshore, which they had occupied.
Immediately upon taking the stockade, the Captain had made it his first order of business to raise the Union Jack--the British flag-- on a log-pole above the fort, although it might seem there could be more productive ways he could have spent his energy and precious time at that perilous moment.
Very soon the scumbag pirates began firing cannonballs at the stockade. This turn of events is told near the end of chapter 18 in the book. A ship's owner speaks to Captain Smollett:
The good Captain, in so doing, was proclaiming to the scoundrels, and to the very world: This here ground we have taken is now for God and King! This here's for law and order! We'll not tolerate mayhem and rebellion! That's our stand and we are stickin' to it.
Now this particularly resolute act of the Captain had good effect, even beyond the mere declaration of it. Young Jim Hawkins, who had been separated from the ship's loyal men, was out in the island somewhere, among the scrubby shrubs and sandy spits, trying to get to the stockade to rejoin his mates. And he had found, long story short, a wild island man who was not actually wild-- though he appeared to be so with the scruffy beard and raggish coverings. This character, name of Ben Gunn, had been marooned on the island by the former buccaneers, the ones who had left the treasure somewhere in the vicinity.
So, meanwhile, back at the outback part of the island where Hawkins and Gunn are dodging cannonballs and musket shots, old Ben says to young Jim, at the beginning of chapter 19:
Which is to say, the ringleader of the mutineers would not be flying the Union Jack. He would not be claiming ground for God and King. He would not be declaring by such actions: This here's for the rule of law. Come ye to this flag and you shall find order, and justice, not mayhem and rebellion! Ben Gunn knew this, and he assured the cabin-boy that the Union Jack was reliable, and so. . .
It could come about that the ship's doctor would later write:
Thus had this incident made known, in Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure Island, the sanctuarial power of Brittania. God save the King, and the Queen, too!
CR, with new novel, Smoke, in progress
Or one could say that, on a bad day, those John Bull limeys were exploiting the indigenous peoples, robbing them of their ancient heritages, playing contractual tricks to abscond their homelands, and getting rich in the process.
And one would be correct on both counts. Such is the dual nature of civilized man: he is a scoundrel, even as he strives, or pretends to, follow his so-called better angels.
Ditto for us Americans, their bratty little brothers in this saga of colonializing world history. But hey, it is what it is, and that's all that it is, so be that as it may, today or someday.
Nevertheless, one beneficial concept that the world has, IMHO, derived from the hegemonizing Brits, is the rule of law. Like the Romans before them, far-flung British representatives of the Crown have, in recent centuries, carried to the four corners of their known world the idea that justice should prevail, and men should be accountable, in a duly-appointed court of law, for their actions.
Therefore anarchy and mayhem are not permitted.
In British literature, a residual benefit of this principle is demonstrated by Robert Louis Stevenson in his classic story, Treasure Island. I'll not tell thee the tale, as thou must read it for thyself, or find a video of it somewhere online haha, as if there were such a thing.
Nevertheless, I'll take thee in thy imagination, as author Stevenson did, down to a little island in some distant sea wherein lies a hidden treasure that was left behind during a dispute between some gentlemen of fortune, some of them honest, some of them not, but which is which, I'll tell thee what--on second thought--suffice it say, some men were killed, and some got caught.
Years later, as the story is told, having obtained a map that could lead to the buried booty, a band of reputable fortune-seeking men have returned to the island to uncover the misplaced gold, which is a considerable weight of what's called pieces of eight. And if'n you don't know what that is, matey, go look it up on your wikipedia slate.
By and by, I'm a-comin' to my point, lads n' lassies, about the civilizing effects of the British empire. And this is how it happened:
There was, to state it plainly, a mutiny among the men. I don't know how else to say it except that certain dirty/rotten scoundrels were led by their wolf-in-sheep's clothing leader, Long John Silver, into the perfidy of lawless rebellion against the good Captain and the owners of the ship who were with him. And there was among the loyals the good lad, Jim Hawkins, cabin boy, who lived to tell the tale, whose account enables me to write it to thee.
Pirates is what they were, pure and simple--Long John Silver and his mutineers.
During the course of the dispute, an actual battle broke out between the two sides. The Captain and his loyal men had managed to occupy an old stockade. The contemptible buccaneers were planning to overpower them with muskets and swords and the ship's cannon offshore, which they had occupied.
Immediately upon taking the stockade, the Captain had made it his first order of business to raise the Union Jack--the British flag-- on a log-pole above the fort, although it might seem there could be more productive ways he could have spent his energy and precious time at that perilous moment.
Very soon the scumbag pirates began firing cannonballs at the stockade. This turn of events is told near the end of chapter 18 in the book. A ship's owner speaks to Captain Smollett:
"Captain," said the squire, "the house is quite invisible from the ship. It must be the flag they are coming at. Would it not be wiser to take it in?"
"Strike my colors!" cried the captain. "No, sir, not I"; and as soon as he had said the words, I think (the ship's doctor is writing this. -ed.) we all agreed with him. For it was not only a piece of stout, seamanly, good feeling; it was good policy besides and showed our enemies that we despised their cannonade.
The good Captain, in so doing, was proclaiming to the scoundrels, and to the very world: This here ground we have taken is now for God and King! This here's for law and order! We'll not tolerate mayhem and rebellion! That's our stand and we are stickin' to it.
Now this particularly resolute act of the Captain had good effect, even beyond the mere declaration of it. Young Jim Hawkins, who had been separated from the ship's loyal men, was out in the island somewhere, among the scrubby shrubs and sandy spits, trying to get to the stockade to rejoin his mates. And he had found, long story short, a wild island man who was not actually wild-- though he appeared to be so with the scruffy beard and raggish coverings. This character, name of Ben Gunn, had been marooned on the island by the former buccaneers, the ones who had left the treasure somewhere in the vicinity.
So, meanwhile, back at the outback part of the island where Hawkins and Gunn are dodging cannonballs and musket shots, old Ben says to young Jim, at the beginning of chapter 19:
As soon as Ben Gunn saw the colors he came to a halt, stopped me by the arm, and sat down.
"Now," said he, "there's your friends, sure enough."
"Far more likely, it's the mutineers," I answered.
"That!" he cried. "Why, in a place like this, where nobody puts in but gen'lmen of fortune, Silver would fly the Jolly Roger, you don't make no doubt of that. No, that's your friends."
Which is to say, the ringleader of the mutineers would not be flying the Union Jack. He would not be claiming ground for God and King. He would not be declaring by such actions: This here's for the rule of law. Come ye to this flag and you shall find order, and justice, not mayhem and rebellion! Ben Gunn knew this, and he assured the cabin-boy that the Union Jack was reliable, and so. . .
It could come about that the ship's doctor would later write:
"And I ran to the door in time to see Jim Hawkins, safe and sound, come climbing over the stockade."
Thus had this incident made known, in Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure Island, the sanctuarial power of Brittania. God save the King, and the Queen, too!
CR, with new novel, Smoke, in progress
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)