Any centrist candidate on either side should stay as far away from the controversy as possible, just as our President did, so wisely, before he was elected in 2020.
These disputes need to be worked out in the Courts, and . . . especially now, in the legislatures. As time goes by, blue states will turn bluer while red states turn redder, if women, children and fathers have the wherewithal to establish their home domiciles in any particular state according to that state's childbirth laws.
But I cannot see that there are enough Americans to actually choose their state of residence based upon these limitations, or liberalities, as the case may be.
Most likely to have a life that is determined by these laws and these events are: (duh) women in childbearing age, probably most of them unmarried.
This divisive issue will moderate in years ahead as women whose lives are truly affected by these laws locate their domiciles in states that are helpful in their respective attitudes and values pertaining to giving birth to children and either raising them or giving them for adoption.
Perhaps recent developments will provide some incentive for young people to get back to where they once belonged. Get back, Loretta.
Adoption is, by the way, a wonderful gift to be given to any child who has been placed into a loving home where childhood is valued and appreciated.
Last point, adoption should not be so doggone expensive! Perhaps money that formerly went to abortion clinics should be redirected to orphanages and adoption agencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment